• Front Page
  • Today's Show
  • Rush's Morning Update
  • Forums
  • Blogs
  • Dittohead Stack-O-Stuff
  • Go To The Polls
  • Rush In The News
  • Why We Rush...
  • The Rush Limbaugh Show
  • CPAC Speech
  • Obama's War on Prosperity
  • The Finer Things
  • Global Warming Hoax
  • EIB One
  • Archives
  • Disclaimer
Home » Forums » The Morning Update

Close To Home

  • Login to post comments
No replies
Mon, 07/13/2009 - 19:17
CigarJunkie's picture
CigarJunkie
User offline. Last seen 1 year 23 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 08/22/2008

Tuesday's Rush Morning Update:
Dateline: 14 July 2009

"The Sunday New York Times published a recent interview with Supreme Court Justice Ruth "Buzzi" Ginsburg. After expressing her annoyance over a 1980 decision that forbids using Medicaid tax dollars for abortions, Justice Ginsburg said this. Quote: "Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations we don't want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to then be set up for Medicaid funding for abortion." End quote.

This is astounding! What is astounding is that a matriarch of modern liberalism was candid about the underlying objective of the abortion movement: to rid society of "undesirables". Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was an early proponent of this view, called "eugenics." Her aim was to wipe out the African-American population. Other infamous world figures acted upon similar instincts, using other means to achieve their objectives: concentration camps, mass gassings, so-called ethnic cleansings.

Justice Ginsburg hasn't yet stated which American populations she would like to see wiped out using Medicaid taxpayer funded abortions. The New York Times interviewer didn't ask -- or perhaps assumed that New York Times readers already knew.

But Justice Ginsburg's remarks tell the real story. They ought to dispel for all time any notion that the abortion movement is about "privacy," or "choice," or "freedom". And it should also tell you why liberals reacted so strongly to my term "feminazi" -- it hit way too close to home."

Rush's Reference:

NY Times: The Place of Women on the Court

‹ Suffer In Silence Compassion? ›
Top
  • Login to post comments

User login

  • Request new password

Founding Documents

The Declaration of Independence
The US Constitution
The Federalist Papers
The Magna Carta
Common Sense


ConList - Best Conservative Blogs on the Internet
Conservative News
Add to Technorati Favorites Show off your blog
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Powered by FeedBurner

Republican Party Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Join My Community at MyBloglog!
We Rush Daily - whereIstand.com Blogroll Me!

RSSMountain


Best Directory - Submit your Website Rush Limbaugh Forum
Rush Limbaugh Forums Rush Limbaugh Blog Rush Limbaugh Blogs

©2008 - 2010 werushdaily.com